Lenovo 10EY000SCS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 10EY000SCS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SKYBAY
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160111
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 22 '20 at 23:20
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100T-$108
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 183
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 277
37% 279 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 30E2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.5068
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.87% Terrible
Lighting 6.07
Reflection 9.46
Parallax 6.19
5% 7.24 fps
MRender 8.57
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 13.2
8% 8.85 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.87%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003LIM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 91.5
Write 52
Mixed 61.3
51% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143DB0-CPB Kingston 9905633-010.A00G 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.7% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 22.9
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 22.7
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback