MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190903
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '20 at 22:08
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 200GE-$52
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 168
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 269
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Gigabyte(1458 22FE) 2GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 21.2
15% 23.4 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 15.7
Splatting 33.8
22% 26.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 156 73 73 74 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 405
Write 373
Mixed 276
SusWrite 99.6
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 11.2
86% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 83
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 16.8
51% 106 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-024.A00G 9905678-014.A00G 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 30.6
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 24.3
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback