HP ProBook 645 G3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP ProBook 645 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 823A
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170413
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateApr 22 '20 at 19:11
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A6-8530B R5, 6 COMPUTE CORES 2C+4G
U4500, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 62.3
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 89.8
45% 70.7 Pts
4-Core 85.5
8-Core 89.1
12% 87.3 Pts
64-Core 85.9
5% 85.9 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 823A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Lighting 4.17
Reflection 6.19
Parallax 5.72
3% 5.36 fps
MRender 3.71
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 5.57
4% 4.59 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-000H1 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT21H3Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 454
Write 420
Mixed 302
87% 392 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 39.6
132% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 159
120% 160 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 7.3
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 21%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 645 G3 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 645 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $33
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback