MSI FM2-A85XA-G43 (MS-7793)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7793
MotherboardMSI FM2-A85XA-G43 (MS-7793)  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 22 '20 at 10:53
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 122
57% 90.9 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 205
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 470
XFX(1682 947D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.1
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.8% Below average
Lighting 44.9
Reflection 61.1
Parallax 64.2
37% 56.7 fps
MRender 62.6
Gravity 45.7
Splatting 51.4
43% 53.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Golden Memory 240GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0509A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 145 42 50 23 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
43% Average
Read 465
Write 370
Mixed 379
SusWrite 97.8
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 1.3
53% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 36.8
DQ Mixed 15
33% 70.5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
750GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 165 165 168 169 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 159
Mixed 100
SusWrite 166
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 1 99U5584-004.A00LF 3 99U5584-004.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.4% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 10
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2-A85XA-G43 (MS-7793) Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI FM2-A85XA-G43 (MS-7793)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback