Lenovo 80TV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80TV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Torronto 5C2
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160810
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 22 '20 at 10:34
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 76.1
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 150
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 172
32% 221 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 60%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 920MX
Legend(17AA 39F1) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4259
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.66% Terrible
Lighting 6.93
Reflection 7.62
Parallax 5.06
6% 6.54 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 7.57
Splatting 7.43
6% 6.83 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.66%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 512GB-$226
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0614D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 344 225 212 135 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 394
Write 353
Mixed 270
SusWrite 216
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 34.3
119% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 170
156% 237 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3AZ Kingston 9905668-002.A00G 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 18.5
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 88
45% 88 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80TV Builds (Compare 1,116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80TV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback