Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	88.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191127
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '20 at 06:14
Run Duration	250 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$206 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Memory 70.8 1-Core 153 2-Core 302 92% 175 Pts	4-Core 550 8-Core 964 91% 757 Pts	64-Core 1,434 89% 1,434 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% Gigabyte(1458 230C) CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.3 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 88.9 Parallax 155 87% 117 fps	MRender 86.7 Gravity 111 Splatting 127 91% 108 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 507 Write 362 Mixed 405 94% 425 MB/s	4K Read 44.8 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 61.5 209% 74.6 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 360 DQ Mixed 364 275% 369 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 75GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 74 56 56 58 56 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	164% Outstanding	Read 1,352 Write 921 Mixed 831 SusWrite 116 178% 805 MB/s	4K Read 57.6 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 74.9 262% 93.9 MB/s	DQ Read 334 DQ Write 648 DQ Mixed 222 245% 402 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 164% Great: 209%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 427GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1437 986 102 171 107 103 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	210% Outstanding	Read 1,437 Write 1580 Mixed 1,090 SusWrite 484 257% 1,148 MB/s	4K Read 59.3 4K Write 173 4K Mixed 80.9 285% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 630 DQ Write 918 DQ Mixed 270 346% 606 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 210% Great: 255%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 811GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 186 187 185 187 186 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	Read 151 Write 112 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 186 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 199GB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 139 149 141 138 151 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Read 159 Write 123 Mixed 86.2 SusWrite 143 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 12,078 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 922GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 124 124 123 112 124 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	41.2% Average	Read 90.5 Write 91.7 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 121 108% 80.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 38% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3000 C15 Series 3000 C15 Series CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.1% Good	MC Read 27 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 26.5 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 20.6 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 26.2 62% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 99.5 40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 860 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	268x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	87x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $189Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	80x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	61x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	45x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	44x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	38x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	38x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $976

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)