Asus Z170-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170-A  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160107
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateApr 21 '20 at 16:49
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$134
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 53.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 241
73% 140 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 462
56% 427 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.5% Below average
Lighting 41.4
Reflection 63.9
Parallax 47.3
34% 50.9 fps
MRender 58
Gravity 25.8
Splatting 47.8
36% 43.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 250 266 274 231 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 426
Mixed 370
SusWrite 256
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 59.6
202% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 316
239% 321 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 110%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HUA7250SBSUN500G 0835JGYMGF 500GB
250GB free
Firmware: GK6OA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 73 72 73 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
43% Average
Read 76.5
Write 82.7
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 72.9
51% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43%
Great: 48%
Hitachi HUA721075KLA330 750GB
698GB free
Firmware: GK8OA74A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 83 82 83 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 82.7
Write 83
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 82.4
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB-$182
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
71.1% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 24.6
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 23.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-A Builds (Compare 8,841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-A - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback