Asus Maximus Extreme

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Maximus Extreme  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '17 at 15:45
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 54.9
2-Core 110
55% 85.5 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 215
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
MSI(1462 2775) 3GB
CLim: 1135 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
42.4% Average
Lighting 55.3
Reflection 36.9
Parallax 68.3
45% 53.5 fps
MRender 34.8
Gravity 54
Splatting 46.1
37% 45 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
899GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 137
Write 116
Mixed 117
93% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.31
4K Mixed 0.39
132% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 76%
WD WD1600ADFD-60NLR1 160GB
68GB free
Firmware: 21.07QR5 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 71.9
Write 73.8
Mixed 66.9
53% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.49
124% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 49%
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80
69GB free
Firmware: 12.01B02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 72.7
Write 76.2
Mixed 76.7
57% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.33
101% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 61%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.04V02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 105
Write 108
Mixed 77.5
72% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 2.71
4K Mixed 0.53
139% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
31% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus Extreme Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Maximus Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $251Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback