Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium M processor 1.60GHz 163 User benchmarks, average bench 25% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Memory 29.6 1-Core 12.6 2-Core 13.3 14% 18.5 Pts	4-Core 14.6 8-Core 15.1 2% 14.9 Pts	64-Core 15.1 1% 15.1 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
PA25-128 127GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20150807 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 1.4 5.3 11 11 9.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 8% Great: 42%
CF CARD 1GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 0% 1GB free Firmware: 20071116 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	0.5% Terrible	Read 0.7 Write 0.5 Mixed 0.6 SusWrite 0.8 0% 0.65 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 33% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.5% Great: 0%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	6.21% Terrible	MC Read 2.2 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 1.8 6% 2.1 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 0.2 2% 0.67 GB/s	Latency 257 16% 257 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.21% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16