ECS GeForce 8000 series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardECS GeForce 8000 series  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090206
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 20 '20 at 20:36
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 22.6
2-Core 42.5
31% 42.9 Pts
4-Core 43.1
8-Core 53.4
6% 48.2 Pts
64-Core 52.3
3% 52.3 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT
EVGA(3842 C802) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.32% Terrible
Lighting 6.13
Reflection 3.77
Parallax 2.91
5% 4.27 fps
MRender 2.29
Gravity 6.63
Splatting 2.48
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.32%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3120813AS 120GB-$98
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 28 19 23 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.57% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 26.3
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 21.7
13% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
39% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 9.57%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 2G-UDIMM 4GB
333, 333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11% Very poor
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3
9% 3.07 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 2
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GeForce 8000 series Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS GeForce 8000 series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback