HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq dc5800 Microtower  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2820h
Memory0.2 GB free of 1.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '17 at 10:05
Run Duration830 Seconds
Run User SYC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5200-$47
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Memory 66.3
1-Core 35.5
2-Core 63.7
37% 55.2 Pts
4-Core 63.8
8-Core 67.2
9% 65.5 Pts
64-Core 64.3
4% 64.3 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$44
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GM2OA5KA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 78.7
Write 74.1
Mixed 73.5
57% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.13
4K Write 0.46
4K Mixed 0.14
30% 0.24 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 50%
HUAWEI TF CARD Storage 1GB
1GB free, PID null
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Read 8.53
Write 1.37
Mixed 2.67
4% 4.19 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 0.13
4K Mixed 0.09
10% 0.28 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 37GB
null MHz
1024, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.1
11% 3.77 GB/s
SC Read 1.1
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 0.1
5% 1.73 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq dc5800 Microtower Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback