Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory43.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190307
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateApr 20 '20 at 12:58
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 78.5
1-Core 131
2-Core 257
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 984
88% 746 Pts
64-Core 1,304
81% 1,304 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Lighting 96.4
Reflection 84.9
Parallax 75.2
79% 85.5 fps
MRender 70.5
Gravity 77.9
Splatting 73.7
61% 74 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 401 403 415 431 420 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 486
Mixed 411
SusWrite 406
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 48.5
166% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 263
224% 329 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 112%
Great: 111%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
76GB free
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 263 289 257 256 204 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 490
Mixed 363
SusWrite 272
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 88.2
4K Mixed 48.2
165% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 256
219% 323 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 104%
Great: 111%
SanDisk Wireless Stick 256GB
183GB free, PID 55a9, SanDisk Connect Wireless stick
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 11 11 12 10 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 12.8
Write 11.3
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 10.9
16% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.3
149% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
71% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 22.5
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 25.1
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 71%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback