Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '20 at 22:47
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 139
59% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 404
42% 336 Pts
64-Core 413
26% 413 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.11.1
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.6% Below average
Lighting 46.2
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 57.7
38% 44.9 fps
MRender 29
Gravity 47.5
Splatting 38.7
32% 38.4 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 129 105 76 66 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 467
Write 400
Mixed 329
SusWrite 121
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 26.3
101% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 124
123% 198 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 88%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$199
137GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 233 116 90 85 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 487
Write 426
Mixed 397
SusWrite 169
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 42.3
141% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 198
157% 221 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 122%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
597GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 149 149 147 148 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 138
Write 135
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 148
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
364% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.M16 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.7% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 10.9
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 10.2
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback