Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150115
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateApr 19 '20 at 21:43
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 126
2-Core 234
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 629
69% 544 Pts
64-Core 631
39% 631 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
XFX(1682 9275) 2GB
CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1410 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 47.6
32% 40.9 fps
MRender 31.3
Gravity 34.9
Splatting 40.3
30% 35.5 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 109 105 98 99 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 339
Write 131
Mixed 200
SusWrite 103
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 30.9
126% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 152
118% 162 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 82%
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
191GB free
Firmware: 01.00101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 114 119 127 96 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 111
Write 120
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 115
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 83%
Seagate Expansion 500GB
189GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 27 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 24.7
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 27.7
21% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
113% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47
136GB free
Firmware: GKAOAB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 83 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 77.2
Write 77.8
Mixed 40
SusWrite 82.5
51% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 46%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
55GB free, PID ab36
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 166 163 161 161 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 175
Write 133
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 153
176% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 73%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
215GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 113 117 116 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 89.5
Write 93.5
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 115
124% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 64C0MHHHJ-HS 04CD F3-10666CL9-8GBXL 01BA 64C0MHHHJ-HS 04CD F3-10666CL9-8GBXL 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 Builds (Compare 1,487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $999
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback