Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	25.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Memory 45.8 1-Core 12.2 2-Core 21.5 20% 26.5 Pts	4-Core 17.6 8-Core 23.3 3% 20.5 Pts	64-Core 27.2 2% 27.2 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 27%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 9.3 55 11 50 9.6 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.5% Poor	Read 226 Write 226 Mixed 160 SusWrite 29.1 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 17.7 4K Mixed 8.7 39% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 78 DQ Write 51.9 DQ Mixed 67 49% 65.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LFS1KBG/2G 1x2GB 2,515 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.43% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 1.1 7% 2.3 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 0.3 3% 1.17 GB/s	Latency 177 23% 177 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.43% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N3700IntelBench 26%, 11,299 samples	52x
Pentium N3710IntelBench 25%, 12,685 samples	39x
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	20x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	121x

SSD
CV3-CE128 128GBLiteonBench 67%, 349 samples	9x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	4x
Ultra II 480GBSanDisk $39Bench 86%, 62,883 samples	4x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	30x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	19x
AO1L16BC4R1-BQSS 1x4GBAdataBench 20%, 3,685 samples	13x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16