| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 40.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| Motherboard | Biostar A770E3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20101103 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 19 '20 at 07:36 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 41% |
PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48.4%
Average
|
45% 68.2 Pts
|
17% 129 Pts
|
8% 130 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: Press
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.4%
Average
|
37% 62 fps
|
47% 57.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 75 81 79 74 MB/s
|
45.8%
Average
|
51% 70 MB/s
|
119% 0.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5402-455.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.7%
Poor
|
28% 9.87 GB/s
|
19% 6.57 GB/s
|
44% 90.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A770E3 Builds (Compare 21 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar A770E3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 4x |
| Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples | 3x |
| Phenom II X4 925AMD $150Bench 51%, 5,211 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Mobility Radeon HD 3400ATIBench 1%, 7,025 samples | 2x |
| GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 1x |
| GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $172 |