| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 59.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161107 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 28 '17 at 13:01 |
| Run Duration | 86 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 45% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.5%
Good
|
57% 93.6 Pts
|
40% 335 Pts
|
26% 428 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781
Asus(1043 04A6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.12.2
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
59.3%
Above average
|
61% 76.4 fps
|
56% 67.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
88.5%
Excellent
|
106% 473 MB/s
|
109% 37.3 MB/s
|
94% 153 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
24.4%
Poor
|
22% 7.73 GB/s
|
19% 6.77 GB/s
|
50% 80.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 902 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 431x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 112x |
| FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples | 85x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 86x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 66x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 51x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $588 |