Gigabyte GA-B450M S2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450M S2H  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191018
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateApr 18 '20 at 09:24
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 86.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 212
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 638
66% 529 Pts
64-Core 846
52% 846 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 56 61 72 16 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 502
Write 438
Mixed 424
SusWrite 103
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 1.2
47% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 8.9
DQ Mixed 0.4
26% 68.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 99%
WDC-WD20EZRX-00A3KB0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MK7ONS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 143 143 144 142 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 138
Write 132
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 143
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 84%
WD WD6400AAVS-00G9B1 640GB
595GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 80 79 79 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 86.3
Write 73.7
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 77.8
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 44.9
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 36.4
117% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 30.8
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450M S2H Builds (Compare 6,761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback