User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemECT
MotherboardMSI Z170A PC MATE (MS-7971)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160523
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 17 '20 at 12:43
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 103
2-Core 182
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 342
42% 319 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
MSI(1462 7971) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Lighting 6.27
Reflection 9.12
Parallax 6.41
5% 7.26 fps
MRender 9.24
Gravity 5.83
Splatting 12.9
8% 9.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60% Above average
Lighting 75.8
Reflection 74.9
Parallax 66.2
62% 72.3 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 69.4
Splatting 68.6
56% 69 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 57 60 35 59 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 331
Write 72
Mixed 102
SusWrite 49.5
30% 139 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 14.3
62% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 54.9
DQ Mixed 70.9
69% 114 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 196 196 194 193 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 179
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 195
104% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 108%
Great: 107%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0909
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 172 175 174 174 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 112
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 174
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 101%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL15-15-15 D4-2133 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
56.7% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.4
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 17.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback