| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150212 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 17 '20 at 09:54 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.4%
Good
|
57% 91 Pts
|
35% 284 Pts
|
22% 351 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
30.1%
Below average
|
31% 36 fps
|
29% 35 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Msft Virtual Disk 107GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 22 22 23 23 MB/s
|
40.3%
Average
|
48% 66 MB/s
|
174% 1.93 MB/s
| |
|
Msft Virtual Disk 54GB
34GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 22 22 23 18 MB/s
|
21.4%
Poor
|
30% 41 MB/s
|
141% 1.53 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
347GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 22 23 23 MB/s
|
52.5%
Above average
|
80% 108 MB/s
|
169% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
|
48.1%
Average
|
50% 17.4 GB/s
|
28% 9.9 GB/s
|
56% 71.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 227x |
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 102x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 95x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 41x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 30x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 27x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $512 |