Asus UX32VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus UX32VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX32VD
Memory7.9 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '20 at 07:52
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3517U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 66.4
1-Core 48.9
2-Core 64.9
41% 60.1 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 123
16% 123 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT620M
Asus(1043 1507) 1GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
3.72% Terrible
Lighting 4.43
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 3.59
4% 4.44 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 4.53
Splatting 4.83
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.72%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 364 321 322 326 344 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 468
Write 421
Mixed 378
SusWrite 342
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 30.9
101% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 282
208% 274 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO8GX3M1A1600C11 Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB 10GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UX32VD Builds (Compare 188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX32VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $251
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback