Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190523
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 16 '20 at 21:27
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 89.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 667
68% 548 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 37.8
Reflection 29.2
Parallax 36
31% 34.3 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 36.7
Splatting 34.8
30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 38 31 32 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 484
Write 50.8
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 38.4
32% 151 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 5.8
51% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 33.3
59% 115 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 78%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA331 1TB
220GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 104 113 118 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 47.7
Write 94.5
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 97.1
51% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 76%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25
737GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 137 137 137 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 152
Write 128
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 137
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.8
186% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 83%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7EH55AA#ABM 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 13.4
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $524
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback