Medionpc MS-7327

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics5.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedionpc MS-7327  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDIONPC MS-7327
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080220
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 16 '20 at 19:10
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 31.2
2-Core 61.4
21% 46.3 Pts
4-Core 98.6
8-Core 102
13% 100 Pts
64-Core 103
6% 103 Pts
Poor: 10% Great: 25%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT
POV(1ACC 913B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
5.18% Terrible
Lighting 7.07
Reflection 7.27
Parallax 2.53
6% 5.62 fps
MRender 3.86
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 4.96
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.18%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 96 107 112 119 121 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.2% Average
Read 221
Write 180
Mixed 173
SusWrite 116
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 20.8
66% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 117
90% 121 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.63 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3
9% 3 GB/s
Latency 535
8% 535 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback