MSI GF615M-P33 (MS-7597)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7597
MotherboardMSI GF615M-P33 (MS-7597)  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '17 at 07:00
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 44.2
2-Core 64.7
44% 63.5 Pts
4-Core 74.6
8-Core 80
10% 77.3 Pts
64-Core 86
5% 86 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.5% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5.08
Parallax 3.47
4% 4.28 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.33
Splatting 3.13
4% 4.46 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.5%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvidia RAID5 931.52G 1TB
914GB free (System drive)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 39.8
Write 24.2
Mixed 29.4
23% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.26
65% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
28.2% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 10.4
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GF615M-P33 (MS-7597) Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI GF615M-P33 (MS-7597)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback