EVGA Classified SR-2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics92.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardEVGA Classified SR-2  (all builds)
Memory32.4 GB free of 40 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130424
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 16 '20 at 17:22
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5680
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 94.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 203
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 654
64% 527 Pts
64-Core 1,499
93% 1,499 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 88.7
Parallax 177
91% 126 fps
MRender 87.7
Gravity 126
Splatting 127
95% 113 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,321
Write 3,028
Mixed 3,108
704% 3,152 MB/s
4K Read 294
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 233
862% 250 MB/s
DQ Read 714
DQ Write 502
DQ Mixed 540
422% 586 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
104GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 220 223 225 220 219 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
77.1% Very good
Read 260
Write 250
Mixed 248
SusWrite 221
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 43
142% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 199
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 129%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
80GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1123 460 297 296 297 296 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,307
Write 1,116
Mixed 640
SusWrite 461
196% 881 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 43
145% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 686
DQ Write 582
DQ Mixed 574
446% 614 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 154%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
880GB free
Firmware: CC9F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 153 144 147 149 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 133
Write 79.8
Mixed 71
SusWrite 147
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
136GB free
Firmware: SC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 123 114 142 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 62.8
Write 79
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 133
59% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 0.5
214% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 114%
500gb RAID 500GB
148GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 113 113 113 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62% Good
Read 103
Write 25.3
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 113
52% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
344GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 115 115 113 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 122
Write 123
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 114
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GV7BMR4A-H9 HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 40GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.1% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 13.6
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Classified SR-2 Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: EVGA Classified SR-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $922
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $547Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback