Gbt___ GBTUACPI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGbt___ GBTUACPI  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory10.8 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090731
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 16 '20 at 00:03
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 130
46% 99.9 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 346
33% 274 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 53% Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.5% Very poor
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 69.2
Parallax 87.6
2% 53.2 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 57
53% 66.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 308 179 103 87 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 542
Write 450
Mixed 383
SusWrite 129
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 25.2
86% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 217
170% 232 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 182%
H/W RAID5 9TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0957
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 49 48 46 55 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 151
Write 43.5
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 44.6
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 122%
H/W RAID0 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0956
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.7 4.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.53% Terrible
Read 11.7
Write 4.5
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 3.9
5% 6.58 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 0.33 MB/s
H/W RAID5 9TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0957
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 47 66 69 61 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 163
Write 43.5
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 51.6
52% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 122%
video 500GB
68GB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 12 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.1% Poor
Read 80.2
Write 12.5
Mixed 17
SusWrite 10.5
22% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 121%
Typical GBTUACPI Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Gbt___ GBTUACPI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback