| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Boot Drive | 37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG NP300E5X-S01AE |
| Memory | 3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20120614 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 15 '20 at 22:42 |
| Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 56% |
PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
39.9%
Below average
|
42% 63.9 Pts
|
10% 83.9 Pts
|
5% 76 Pts
|
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 73 109 110 139 127 MB/s
|
37.3%
Below average
|
30% 137 MB/s
|
42% 14.4 MB/s
|
111% 181 MB/s
|
|
WD Elements 1TB
295GB free
Firmware: 8102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 19 18 20 20 MB/s
|
11.2%
Very poor
|
14% 18.5 MB/s
|
55% 0.53 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
|
19.2%
Very poor
|
18% 6.27 GB/s
|
13% 4.7 GB/s
|
37% 107 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,057 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 348x |
| Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples | 152x |
| Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples | 93x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $80 |