Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190806
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 15 '20 at 22:26
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 80.7
1-Core 151
2-Core 299
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 1,009
97% 800 Pts
64-Core 1,440
89% 1,440 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 207
Reflection 218
Parallax 221
168% 215 fps
MRender 253
Gravity 201
Splatting 137
155% 197 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 151%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GB-$223
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1133 1118 1114 1097 1037 788 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,566
Write 1,190
Mixed 821
SusWrite 1,048
258% 1,156 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 54.4
207% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 688
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 512
376% 504 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 212%
Great: 220%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
19GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 518
Write 497
Mixed 470
110% 495 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 61.8
210% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 370
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
54GB free
Firmware: DXM03B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 354 360 327 332 334 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 362
Mixed 260
SusWrite 343
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 41.9
168% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 128
144% 248 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 134 138 123 126 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
62% Good
Read 84.2
Write 116
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 130
70% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.6
217% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 201 202 203 204 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 149
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 201
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 115%
Great: 114%
Seagate Desktop 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 41.5
Write 37.5
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 38.4
28% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.2
230% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$118
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 36.3
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 34.6
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $640
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback