Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '20 at 10:12
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 94.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 252
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 840
80% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,090
68% 1,090 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 167
Parallax 167
140% 169 fps
MRender 195
Gravity 155
Splatting 114
122% 154 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 127%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 446 469 475 477 460 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 419
Mixed 317
SusWrite 460
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 31.8
127% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 161
134% 198 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 124%
Patriot Wildfire 120GB-$91
55GB free
Firmware: 332ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 167 168 144 143 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 390
Write 202
Mixed 244
SusWrite 159
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 41.5
158% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 217
168% 232 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 85%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
308GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1442 1125 601 601 602 603 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,834
Write 1,732
Mixed 790
SusWrite 829
289% 1,296 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 54.5
204% 76.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,042
DQ Write 1,236
DQ Mixed 856
724% 1,045 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 237%
Great: 254%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
287GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 101 101 108 99 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 132
Write 113
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 103
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
679GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 118 120 118 118 119 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3466 C16 2x8GB-$253
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 36.2
MC Mixed 26.6
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 24
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 57.6
69% 57.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X HERO Builds (Compare 3,692 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback