AMD 970A-DS3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics74.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAMD 970A-DS3  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121018
Uptime2 Days
Run DateApr 15 '20 at 09:27
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 122
57% 90.8 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 266
31% 239 Pts
64-Core 250
16% 250 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 2182) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.9% Very good
Lighting 93.3
Reflection 92.3
Parallax 86.9
76% 90.9 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 87.1
Splatting 77.2
73% 90.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 480GB 480GB
376GB free
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 328 335 339 348 328 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 391
Write 343
Mixed 291
SusWrite 333
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 18.8
97% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 25.1
DQ Write 93.3
DQ Mixed 22
28% 46.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
801GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 136 142 139 149 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 93
Write 175
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 137
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-034.A 99U5471-012.A 8GB
800, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 8.2
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-DS3 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: AMD 970A-DS3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback