Asus Z97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 15 '20 at 06:25
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 96.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 230
86% 150 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 650
68% 548 Pts
64-Core 649
40% 649 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
MSI(1462 8A9C) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 17.2
16% 17.8 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 17
16% 19.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,278
Write 5,925
Mixed 6,232
1,442% 6,478 MB/s
4K Read 819
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 314
1,752% 446 MB/s
DQ Read 1,282
DQ Write 726
DQ Mixed 844
671% 951 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
52GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 288 162 109 88 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 445
Mixed 323
SusWrite 181
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 42.6
158% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 57.2
112% 226 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
89GB free
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 109 109 104 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63% Good
Read 111
Write 112
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 108
73% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 63%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
402GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 135 132 129 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 132
Write 103
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 133
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 112%
1.5TB free, PID 0561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 34.2
Write 28.1
Mixed 27
SusWrite 28.2
39% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1632 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.1% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 20
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 22.1
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 53.7
74% 53.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97M-PLUS - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $998
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback