Asrock M3N78D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock M3N78D  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '20 at 13:19
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 645
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 78.6
1-Core 48.9
2-Core 98
48% 75.2 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 194
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240
Asus(1043 8326) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.44
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.03% Terrible
Lighting 6.77
Reflection 7.58
Parallax 2.78
6% 5.71 fps
MRender 6.81
Gravity 4.73
Splatting 4
4% 5.18 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.03%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvidia STRIPE 596.18G0100 640GB
560GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 204 209 211 214 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 178
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 196
111% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
188% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 110%
Great: 113%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.2 5.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
5.86% Terrible
Read 25.3
Write 4
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.2
10% 9.68 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.86%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
25.4% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 7.9
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M3N78D Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock M3N78D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback