TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

_ _

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive99.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System_ _  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '20 at 02:13
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 219
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 596
57% 471 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 77.1%
 Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Intel(8086 1912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.79% Terrible
Lighting 7.53
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 8.38
6% 8.83 fps
MRender 9.52
Gravity 6.27
Splatting 12.6
8% 9.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 6.79%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P190710b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 446 444 431 371 232 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 389
Mixed 384
SusWrite 396
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 46.6
154% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 225
167% 216 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 99.2%
 Great: 101%
Samsung SM841 mSATA 256GB
144GB free
Firmware: DXM44D6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 213 207 206 245 240 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 459
Write 220
Mixed 249
SusWrite 220
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 33.8
141% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 99.6
DQ Mixed 88.9
91% 153 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 82.7%
 Great: 99%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 121 121 124 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 79.3
Write 124
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 122
69% 95 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.3
242% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 57.9%
 Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
V02D4S84GB5285282400 1315 CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.8% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 20.8
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 18.8
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 71.8%
 Great: 73%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical _ Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: _ _

CPU
Core i5-6300UIntelBench 40%, 59,619 samples7x
Core i5-7500Intel  $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples5x
Core i5-6500Intel  $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples4x
GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples7x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 65,338 samples5x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples4x
SSD
SSD 64GBSanDisk  $56Bench 38%, 3,862 samples7x
T253512GB 512GBTeamBench 82%, 3,987 samples4x
SSDSCKKF256G8 SATA 256GBIntelBench 82%, 3,569 samples3x
RAM
M378A2K43DB1-CTD 01BA M4U16S681LJJJ43-12 32GBSamsungBench 61%, 3 samples3x
9905624-008.A00G 1x8GBKingstonBench 39%, 488 samples2x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x4GBCorsairBench 68%, 12,708 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $56
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback