Asus Z87-DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z87-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 10 '15 at 20:44
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 138
2-Core 277
94% 207 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 539
73% 545 Pts
64-Core 543
34% 543 Pts
Poor: 51% Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4807
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 14
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 8.53
11% 11.8 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 15.5
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 524
Write 491
Mixed 405
106% 473 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 3.11
118% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 65.3
104% 196 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 155
Write 141
Mixed 32.1
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.26
77% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 146
Mixed 114
110% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.33
92% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 114%
Typical Z87-DELUXE Builds (Compare 464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Z87-DELUXE - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $744
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback