MSI Z77MA-G45 (MS-7759)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7759
MotherboardMSI Z77MA-G45 (MS-7759)  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131024
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 25 '17 at 19:56
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$186
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 181
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 460
49% 389 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36EE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1606 MHz, MLim: 1902 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Lighting 47.1
Reflection 41.3
Parallax 33.9
38% 40.7 fps
MRender 42.1
Gravity 45.8
Splatting 40.5
35% 42.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
121GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 112
Write 116
Mixed 72.6
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.97
4K Mixed 0.41
144% 1.66 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 129
Write 124
Mixed 115
92% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 2.36
4K Mixed 0.21
88% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905458-020.A00LF Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77MA-G45 (MS-7759) Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI Z77MA-G45 (MS-7759)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback