HP p6720f

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP p6720f  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110118
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 13 '20 at 05:46
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 840T
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 35.5
2-Core 79.8
44% 64.9 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 129
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
XFX(1682 3060) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.3% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 8.77
Parallax 6.16
6% 7.54 fps
MRender 8.29
Gravity 5.17
Splatting 9.3
6% 7.59 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.3%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 35 34 34 35 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.4% Above average
Read 238
Write 209
Mixed 208
SusWrite 33.6
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 32.6
106% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 121
92% 125 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 134%
Mb1000hb LMB 1TB
268GB free
Firmware: HPG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 33 34 35 34 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 95
Write 34
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 33.6
37% 50.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-447.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.4% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 12.3
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 8.6
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6720f Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6720f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $492Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback