HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	38.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8309
Memory	1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170710
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Apr 13 '20 at 00:24
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 72.7 1-Core 97.5 2-Core 183 67% 118 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 525 52% 424 Pts	64-Core 529 33% 529 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580 6,488 User benchmarks, average bench 41% HP(103C 83C2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.10.26 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	38.6% Below average	Lighting 43.2 Reflection 64.5 Parallax 61.3 35% 56.3 fps	MRender 65.7 Gravity 46.5 Splatting 54.2 45% 55.5 fps
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 186 182 177 171 172 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	175% Outstanding	Read 1,849 Write 1,070 Mixed 790 SusWrite 211 216% 980 MB/s	4K Read 49.1 4K Write 90.6 4K Mixed 60.8 200% 66.8 MB/s	DQ Read 654 DQ Write 484 DQ Mixed 610 445% 583 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 175% Great: 236%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 360GB free Firmware: MS2OA800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 184 179 182 181 178 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	Read 151 Write 146 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 178 92% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB 22,600 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	43.5% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 14.6 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 14.7 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 95.2 42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 1,316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 55%

Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	514x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	222x
Core i5-7400Intel $91Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	220x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	328x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	232x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	141x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	167x
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	87x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	71x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	202x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	137x
HMA81GU6MFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 75%, 2,884 samples	77x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $299

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16