WYSE Z CLASS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemWYSE Z CLASS  (all builds)
MotherboardInventec Z CLASS
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131107
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 11 '20 at 19:00
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD G-T52R
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Memory 51.6
1-Core 18
2-Core 14
23% 27.9 Pts
4-Core 17.5
8-Core 18
2% 17.8 Pts
64-Core 18.2
1% 18.2 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543216L9A300 160GB-$99
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FB2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 24 14 46 49 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 50
Write 50.8
Mixed 27
SusWrite 36.9
30% 41.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 25%
Great: 35%
Adata DashDrive UV150 USB 3.0 16GB-$39
7GB free, PID dc1a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 11 14 15 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 12.8
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 13.7
22% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.6
45% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 484D543432355536 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.1% Very poor
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 3.5
8% 2.97 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.6
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z CLASS Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: WYSE Z CLASS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback