Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX2530 M1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY RX2530 M1  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3279-A1
Memory15.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160323
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 11 '20 at 11:01
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 30.9
2-Core 65.3
37% 54.7 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 284
27% 223 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MegaSR 2TB
849GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 26 26 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 173
Write 24.5
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 25.1
46% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G3A3 Hynix HMA41GR7AFR4N-UH Hynix HMA41GR7AFR4N-UH 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.8% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.73 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 7.8
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback