Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateApr 11 '20 at 06:45
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 88.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 263
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 511
69% 514 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8572) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 4.23
Parallax 4.28
4% 4.25 fps
MRender 4.43
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 6
4% 4.74 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 216 80 73 61 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 331
Mixed 342
SusWrite 154
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 59.3
182% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 134%
WD WD2002FAEX-007BA 2TB
183GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 79 78 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 117
Write 110
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 77.7
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
37GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 53 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 53.5
Write 56
Mixed 54
SusWrite 53.6
40% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
161GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 78 78 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
48% Average
Read 89.2
Write 8.3
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 77.7
36% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48%
Great: 59%
WD WD60EZRX-00MVLB1 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 127 129 129 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 138
Write 119
Mixed 78
SusWrite 128
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C15D4/8G KHX2666C16/8G KHX2666C15D4/8G KHX2666C16/8G 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 27.3
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 23.9
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,093 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $888
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback