Blade Shadow Computer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics98.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemBlade Shadow Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardBlade ShadowM
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '20 at 00:11
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 160
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 504
52% 417 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Zotac(19DA 1425) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.2% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 137
Parallax 131
103% 131 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 121
Splatting 99.8
88% 109 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 118 116 107 120 117 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 108%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 930GB
866GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48% Average
Read 154
Write 12
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 11.9
36% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
171% 1.37 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Blade EZGA0KNWVXVXX4-918 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
66.3% Good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 24.3
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 16.7
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Shadow Computer Builds (Compare 607 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Blade Shadow Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback