Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 (all builds)
Memory	7.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 10 '20 at 20:31
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4350-$118 11,995 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 89.3 1-Core 78.9 2-Core 147 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 240 32% 240 Pts	64-Core 241 15% 241 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290 24,657 User benchmarks, average bench 19% PwrHis(1787 2010) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Lighting 31.4 Reflection 22.6 Parallax 25.1 26% 26.4 fps	MRender 21.1 Gravity 23.2 Splatting 29.1 20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: 040H SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 174 161 163 159 161 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.3% Below average	Read 189 Write 174 Mixed 138 SusWrite 160 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 13.1 68% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 20.3 DQ Write 66.1 DQ Mixed 14.6 20% 33.7 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 74%
Crucial Gizmo! 4GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 4GB free, PID a811 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	4.25% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 3.5 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 3.6 7% 7.25 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.25% Great: 5%
Crucial Gizmo! JR. 1GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 0163 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.2 5.2 5.2 5 5.2 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	4.68% Terrible	Read 12.7 Write 3.8 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 5.1 8% 6.78 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.68% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 10GB 21,027 User benchmarks, average bench 31% null MHz 4096, 4096, 1024, 1024 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	43.7% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 16.3 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 13.9 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 Builds (Compare 1,727 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	537x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	263x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	256x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	158x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	94x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	82x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	62x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	40x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	450x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	261x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	225x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16