Lenovo 80SV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80SV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Torronto 5C1
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161229
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateApr 10 '20 at 15:33
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 52.2
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 190
59% 110 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 268
36% 272 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 39F1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
2.88% Terrible
Lighting 2.93
Reflection 10
Parallax 2.94
2% 5.3 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 2.73
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.49 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.88%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP-000L2 256GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT61L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 210 160 96 82 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 372
Mixed 285
SusWrite 148
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 46.4
152% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 325
253% 348 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 111%
Kesu USB 3.0 750GB
311GB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 104 108 110 108 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 114
Write 108
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 106
65% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3AZ Ramaxel RMSA3270MB76H8F2400 6GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 14.8
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80SV Builds (Compare 974 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80SV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback