Alienware M17xR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive18.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAlienware M17xR4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware M17xR4
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600x900x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180528
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateApr 10 '20 at 11:56
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2820QM-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 128
60% 95.7 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 177
26% 190 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 580M
Dell(1028 0580) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 340.46
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 13.3
12% 15.2 fps
MRender 19.7
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 16.2
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 45 48 43 79 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 338
Write 54.5
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 48.2
25% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 2.3
7% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 85%
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52
278GB free
Firmware: JE4OA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 64 64 65 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 65.2
Write 61
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 63.7
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B5273CH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.1% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 8.6
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M17xR4 Builds (Compare 672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware M17xR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback