Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5700HQ 14,004 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Memory 85.5 1-Core 46.1 2-Core 107 51% 79.5 Pts	4-Core 148 8-Core 209 22% 178 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M 73,363 User benchmarks, average bench 16% MSI(1462 1138) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Lighting 14.8 Reflection 16.3 Parallax 13.3 12% 14.8 fps	MRender 23.8 Gravity 14.3 Splatting 16.3 15% 18.1 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 18%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM11.1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,562 Write 33 Mixed 61.7 253% 1,219 MB/s	4K Read 254 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 4.1 392% 86.8 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 12GB 2,152 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	41.8% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 11.9 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 13.8 36% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 5600IntelBench 4%, 7,009 samples	172x
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples	106x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	33x

SSD
HFS128G39MNC-3310A 128GBBench 78%, 1,122 samples	24x
HG6 SATA M.2 128GBToshibaBench 76%, 5,880 samples	23x
860 EVO M.2 500GBSamsungBench 101%, 35,237 samples	7x

RAM
MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 29%, 6,146 samples	54x
MSI16D3LS1MNG/4G MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 12GBKingstonBench 41%, 1,042 samples	28x
MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 54%, 4,507 samples	25x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16