Lenovo 255511G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 255511G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '17 at 15:30
Run Duration85 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$248
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 195
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 378
48% 364 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.52% Terrible
Lighting 7.63
Reflection 9
Parallax 6.38
6% 7.67 fps
MRender 9.62
Gravity 7.87
Splatting 8.61
7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.52%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 490
Write 271
Mixed 157
67% 306 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 19.5
89% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 60.6
74% 133 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF51272AZ-1G4M1 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.4
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 255511G Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 255511G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $283
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback