HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3397
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '20 at 17:11
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 99.9 2-Core 201 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 389 52% 391 Pts	64-Core 387 24% 387 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600 8,087 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 094B) 1GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.94% Terrible	Lighting 4.27 Reflection 4.12 Parallax 4.5 4% 4.29 fps	MRender 5.19 Gravity 4.93 Splatting 7.09 5% 5.74 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.94% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST1000LM014-SSHD-8GB 1TB 16,795 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 549GB free (System drive) Firmware: LVD5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 76 78 79 86 87 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	47.8% Average	Read 87.4 Write 90.5 Mixed 56 SusWrite 79.2 58% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.2 58% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 63%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 596GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 109 109 109 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Read 112 Write 104 Mixed 77.2 SusWrite 109 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173EB0-YK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 17.3 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 17.4 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	2,478x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,469x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	800x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1,928x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	727x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	490x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	267x
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	83x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	78x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	65x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	57x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16