Asus SABERTOOTH P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
9 years ago, 9 years ago.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH P67  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '15 at 15:06
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 114
2-Core 230
78% 172 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 663
68% 549 Pts
64-Core 662
41% 662 Pts
Poor: 56% Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 480-$500
Asus(1043 8349) 1.5GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.5306
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 42
Parallax 30.1
22% 33.2 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 22.3
Splatting 31.7
25% 31.2 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 463GB
242GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.6% Poor
Read 116
Write 241
Mixed 144
38% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 0.52
7% 3.93 MB/s
DQ Read 2.28
DQ Write 7.34
DQ Mixed 1.52
2% 3.72 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 137%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 537GB
427GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 235
Write 290
Mixed 195
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 1.08
12% 6.19 MB/s
DQ Read 3.8
DQ Write 12.8
DQ Mixed 2.63
4% 6.42 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 258%
Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 240GB-$181
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
72% Very good
Read 496
Write 148
Mixed 197
61% 280 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 16.9
125% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 33.8
61% 120 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72%
Great: 90%
Typical SABERTOOTH P67 Builds (Compare 1,281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH P67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $599
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback