Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	17.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Itmediaconsult Pentino Slim (all builds)
Motherboard	Foxconn Q45M
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20090602
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '20 at 13:36
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad-$90 5,765 User benchmarks, average bench 43% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Memory 64.6 1-Core 27.1 2-Core 45.7 33% 45.8 Pts	4-Core 60 8-Core 75.4 9% 67.7 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 77 26 53 15 10 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.1% Very poor	Read 156 Write 164 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 39.1 21% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 11.3 4K Mixed 1.1 28% 8.63 MB/s	DQ Read 24.4 DQ Write 15.8 DQ Mixed 0.3 6% 13.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 85%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 167GB free Firmware: ST6OA31B SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 77 26 53 15 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	27% Poor	Read 54.5 Write 49.5 Mixed 35.3 SusWrite 39.2 33% 44.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston Samsung M3 78T5663EH3-CF7 Samsung M3 78T5663EH3-CF7 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 800, 800, 800, 800 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.23 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 4.7 13% 4.57 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 17%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16