HP xw9400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP xw9400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A1Ch
Memory13.4 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '20 at 11:47
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Six-Core AMD Opteron 2435
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 68.8
1-Core 38.5
2-Core 74.8
40% 60.7 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 305
27% 229 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.5% Poor
Lighting 34.3
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 31.2
28% 30.3 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 3.74
18% 24.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN 1TB
897GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 2.8 1.6 3 3.8 7.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 20.3
Write 8.8
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 3.7
8% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 49GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.77 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 5
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw9400 Workstation Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP xw9400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback